No. 22-304
Frank Oswald v. Nicholas Mauer, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claims constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review reasonable-jurists sixth-circuit
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a Circuit Court's denial of an application for a Certificate of Appealability based on the merits of the appeal, rather than on whether reasonable jurists could disagree on a petitioner's constitutional claims, violate a petitioner's constitutional right to due process?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a Circuit Court's denial of an application for a Certificate of Appealability based on the merits of the appeal, rather than on whether reasonable jurists could disagree on a petitioner's constitutional claims, violate a petitioner's constitutional right to due process?
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-10-03
Waiver of right of respondent Nicholas Mauer, Summit County Adult Probation Officer, et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Frank Oswald
Ian N. Friedman — Friedman and Associates LLC, Petitioner
Nicholas Mauer, Summit County Adult Probation Officer, et al.
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent