No. 22-288

TD Bank, N.A. v. Tania Pulliam, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-09-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: attorney-fees civil-procedure consumer-credit contract-law creditor-liability holder-rule recovery-limitation seller-misconduct
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether, and in what circumstances, the Holder Rule's limit on "recovery" by the debtor, 16 C.F.R. § 433.2(a), applies to, and thus caps, an attorney's fee award in a Holder Rule suit, asserting claims against a creditor based on seller misconduct.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Holder Rule's limit on 'recovery' by the debtor applies to and caps an attorney's fee award in a Holder Rule suit against a creditor based on seller misconduct

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-13
2022-11-28
2022-10-26
2022-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 28, 2022.
2022-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 27, 2022 to November 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-23
2022-08-17
Application (22A134) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 23, 2022.
2022-08-11
Application (22A134) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 24, 2022 to September 23, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

American Bankers Assn., American Financial Services Assn., et al.
Jan T. ChiltonSeverson & Werson, Amicus
Tania Pulliam
Jennifer Dale BennettGupta Wessler, PLLC, Respondent
TD Bank, N.A.
Jonathan Yates EllisMcGuireWoods LLP, Petitioner