Whether or not the Indiana Supreme Court decided an issue without determining the effect of the In-diana Court of Appeals granting Respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. a summary judgment—while at the same time—Petitioners Gail Lewis Hicks and Larry Hicks had a judgment on the pleadings which had not been vacated and thereby affected Petitioners' Due Process Rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.

Whether the Indiana Supreme Court decided an issue without determining the effect of the Indiana Court of Appeals granting Respondent a summary judgment while Petitioners had a judgment on the pleadings that had not been vacated, affecting Petitioners' Due Process Rights