No. 22-264
Shahrouz Jahanshahi v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure court-discretion deposition-procedure discovery due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-litigant litigation-costs remote-deposition remote-testimony
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, under California law a court can order an indigent litigant that is granted in forma pauperis to conduct deposition by remote means that is discretionary and more costly than traditional means of conducting deposition.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court can order an indigent litigant granted in forma pauperis to conduct deposition by remote means that is discretionary and more costly than traditional means
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 20, 2022)
2022-07-28
Application (22A77) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 17, 2022.
2022-07-19
Application (22A77) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 19, 2022 to September 17, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Shahrouz Jahanshahi
Shahrouz Jahanshahi — Petitioner