1. Whether a federal court of appeals that affirms summary judgment for a defendant in a diversity jurisdiction case, without addressing all well-grounded, independent bases for state law liability, violates its obligation of responsible and meaningful appellate review.

2. Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals clearly misapprehended the summary judgment standards established by this Court by crediting the movant-Respondent's evidence, drawing factual inferences in movant-Respondent's favor, and failing to acknowledge or credit nonmovant-Petitioner's key contradictory evidence.

Whether a federal court of appeals violated its obligation of responsible and meaningful appellate review