No. 22-234
Texas, et al. v. Cook County, Illinois, et al.
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure due-process executive-power federal-rule immigration intervention judicial-procedure litigation-strategy public-charge standing
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether petitioners were entitled to intervene in defense of the Rule when they sought to do so within days of the federal government's unprecedented litigation maneuvering.
2. Whether petitioners are entitled to either relief from the district court's judgment under Rule 60(b)(6) or equitable vacatur of that judgment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioners were entitled to intervene in defense of the Rule
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-11-28
Reply of petitioners Texas, et al. filed.
2022-11-14
Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
2022-11-09
Brief of respondents Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc. and Cook County, Illinois in opposition filed.
2022-09-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2022, for all respondents.
2022-09-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2022 to November 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2022)
Attorneys
Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, Inc.; Cook County, Illinois
Tacy Fletcher Flint — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
State of Texas, et al.
Judd Edward Stone II — Texas Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent