No. 22-230
The Golden 1 Credit Union v. Dwaine Burgardt
Tags: discriminates against arbitration and is contrary when such modifications are permitted under ordin arbitration-agreement contract-law contract-modification federal-arbitration-act jury-trial jury-trial-waiver kindred-nursing mutual-assent state-common-law state-law
Latest Conference:
2022-11-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a special rule that prohibits parties from adding an arbitration provision to a contract by mutual assent manifested by conduct, when such modifications are permitted under ordinary contract law principles, discriminates against arbitration and is contrary to the FAA?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a special rule that prohibits parties from adding an arbitration provision to a contract by mutual assent manifested by conduct, when such modifications are permitted under ordinary contract law principles, discriminates against arbitration and is contrary to the FAA?
Docket Entries
2022-11-07
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/4/2022.
2022-10-13
Brief amicus curiae of Credit Union National Association filed.
2022-10-12
Waiver of right of respondent Dwaine Burgardt to respond filed.
2022-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2022)
2022-07-13
Application (22A25) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 8, 2022.
2022-07-07
Application (22A25) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 9, 2022 to September 8, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Credit Union National Association
Dwaine Burgardt
Jennifer Dale Bennett — Gupta Wessler, PLLC, Respondent
The Golden 1 Credit Union
E. Joshua Rosenkranz — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner