No. 22-215
Heslin Gallagher v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: 7th-amendment absolute-immunity civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jury-trial quasi-governmental-immunity securities-exchange-commission self-regulatory-organization seventh-amendment standing
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether clarification is needed to resolve the conflicts among the various circuits when a Self-Regulatory Organization registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission invokes absolute immunity while engaged in its own private business.
2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's equivocal standard that "quasi-governmental immunity" must be "pierced" prior to a jury trial, violates the Seventh Amendment's preservation clause.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether clarification is needed to resolve the conflicts among the various circuits when a Self-Regulatory Organization registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission invokes absolute immunity while engaged in its own private business
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-15
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Heslin Gallagher
2022-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc., et al.
David S. Mandel — Mandel & Mandel LLP, Respondent
Heslin Gallagher
Heslin Gallagher — Petitioner