No. 22-21

Abdur-Rahim Dib Dubar v. Department of Community Affairs

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 11th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eleventh-amendment federal-jurisdiction immunity-waiver procedural-default standing taking-clause takings waiver
Key Terms:
Takings DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Was Petitioner's Amended Complaint considered in All Courts?

2. Even if considered immune by the Eleventh Amendment in an abstract form, did DCA waive this immunity?

3. Could DCA argue with Immunity in U.S. Courts when such Immunity was stripped from it after November 3, 2020 when Federal Courts got engaged?

4. Is the Taking Clause impaired by the eleventh Amendment?

5. Could the State withdraw DOCUMENT Two without prejudice?

6. Could the State not perform under DOCUMENT THREE without prejudice?

7. Could the State refuse to perform after issuing Document Two and Document Three without prejudice?

8. Is not complying with DOCUMENT TWO and Document Three a Taking?

9. Does not issuing a HAP contract constitute a Taking and KNICK'S LAW is applicable?

10. Is a Default Judgment proper when none of the Defendants (Respondents) answered the AMENDED Complaint?

11. Did Judge Cox commit the 1983 crime?

12. Did Aanal Patel commit the 1983 crime?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Petitioner's Amended Complaint considered in All Courts?

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Community Affairs to respond filed.
2022-05-14

Attorneys

Abdur-Rahim Dubar
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar — Petitioner
Department of Community Affairs
Stephen John PetranyGeorgia Department of Law, Respondent