No. 22-198
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure commercial-exploitation due-process exclusion-right exclusive-use lanham-act property-rights trademark-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-10-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Under the US Constitutional property rights and Lanham Act provisions to "exclusive use", does Amazon.com, Inc or any other third parties have the right commercially exploit and appropriate goodwill of Ayse Sen 's Baiden Trademark ("Baiden Mark ") without her consent?
2) District Court dismissed Sen 's two cases regarding the same repeating violations including continual new violations. Should Sen be denied Due Process instead of the dispute being fully and completely litigated before the jury?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Amazon.com, Inc. or any other third parties have the right to commercially exploit and appropriate goodwill of Ayse Sen's Baiden Trademark without her consent?
Docket Entries
2022-10-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Amazon.com, Inc. to respond filed.
2022-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 3, 2022)
2022-06-29
Application (21A870) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 27, 2022.
2022-06-24
Application (21A870) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 28, 2022 to August 27, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Amazon.com, Inc.
Gregory L. Doll — Doll Amir & Eley LLP, Respondent
Ayse Sen
Ayse Sen — Petitioner