No. 22-19
Tags: arbitral-award arbitration civil-procedure foreign-arbitral-award foreign-proceedings forum-non-conveniens international-arbitration international-law judicial-confirmation jurisdiction jurisdictional-doctrine
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the doctrine of forum non conveniens is available in proceedings to confirm a foreign arbitral award in the United States.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the doctrine of forum non conveniens is available in proceedings to confirm a foreign arbitral award in the United States
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-09-06
Reply of petitioner Ukraine filed. (Distributed)
2022-08-23
Brief of respondent PAO Tatneft in opposition filed.
2022-07-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2022.
2022-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2022 to August 23, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)
2022-03-23
Application (21A528) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 3, 2022.
2022-03-18
Application (21A528) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 4, 2022 to July 3, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
PAO Tatneft
Hyland Hunt — Deutsch Hunt PLLC, Respondent
Ukraine
John Patrick Elwood — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Petitioner
Linda T. Coberly — Winston & Strawn, LLP, Petitioner
Maria Kostytska — Winston & Strawn, LLP, Petitioner