No. 22-172
Swisher International, Inc. v. Trendsettah USA, Inc., et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction article-iii article-three civil-procedure final-judgment-rule interlocutory-appeal mandamus microsoft-v-baker voluntary-dismissal
Latest Conference:
2022-12-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does an appellate court have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Article III when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses its claims with prejudice in order to obtain review of an interlocutory ruling?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an appellate court have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Article III when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses its claims with prejudice in order to obtain review of an interlocutory ruling?
Docket Entries
2022-12-05
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
2022-11-08
Reply of petitioner Swisher International, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2022-10-21
Brief of respondents Trendsettah USA, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2022-09-22
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
2022-09-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 21, 2022.
2022-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 23, 2022 to October 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 23, 2022)
Attorneys
Swisher International, Inc.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Trendsettah USA, Inc., et al.
Eric F. Citron — Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Respondent
Washington Legal Foundation