No. 22-17
Vaxima, Inc., et al. v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 28-usc-2461 breach-of-contract criminal-conviction criminal-forfeiture honeycutt-decision honeycutt-v-united-states indictment statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a criminal forfeiture judgment against Petitioners Vaxima, Inc. and GenPhar, Inc. (collectively "Petitioners") under 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), is permitted under this Court's decision in Honeycutt v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1626 (2017) ("Honeycutt").
2. Whether a criminal conviction can be supported by an indictment alleging that Petitioners' conduct amounted to breach of contract.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal forfeiture judgment against Petitioners is permitted under Honeycutt
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vaxima, Inc., et al.
Robert Edward Barnes — Barnes law, Petitioner