1. This case naturally has federal law issues. First of all, it is necessary to examine whether the remarks of the petitioner SIYU YANG (abbreviation: SY) belong to "racism", which itself is the first and inevitable federal issue object that the Federal Court must examine and adjust. was the original subject of this case.

2. Examining that the defendant treated the petitioner differently. "Racial discrimination" against plaintiff SY.

3. Reviewing the U.S. Second Circuit Judge's hearing, The petitioners are treated differently. "Racial discrimination" against plaintiffs SY and LY.

4. All of the leading justices in this matter violated the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which relates to civil rights, due process, and equal protection.

5. Judge ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD(abbreviation: EW ) of the Federal Western District Court , vaguely ascertained and distorted the facts. Abuse of case law, abuse of federal civil procedure Rule 12(b), abuse of discretion.

6. Examining the criminal liability of defendants to submit fraudulent affidavits to the judicial system. Review of federal circuit and Monroe County, N.Y., court judges for shielding defendants' malfeasance.

7. Review the "defamatory conduct" by the defendant against the plaintiff SY.

8. Review the defendant's collusion with the CCP to persecute young people.

9. Review the defendant's violation of the petitioner's right to free speech.

10. Review the defendant's specific violation of New York State law, namely contract law, in violation of the University's Student Handbook. Due process and equal protection were not granted in the expulsion of petitioner SY. University management also continued to commit fraudulent practices during the grievance process.

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the First Amendment's free speech protections