1. Shall the lower Courts, District Court followed by
the Appellate Court, deliberately stand a Constitutional
conflict in law, by judicially shielding the State Public
Actor(s) by amending the Eleventh Amendment beyond
the scope of its written Text by Order of the aforemen
tioned lower Courts?

2. Shall the lower Courts, District Court followed
by the Appellate Court contradict this Court that ruled
Nominal Damages are an actionable cause for the
addressment of Constitutional and Legal Wrongs
committed by a State 's Public Actors?

3. Shall the lower Courts, the District Court
followed by the Appellate Court, judicially move con
trary to the Laws of Michigan, the Laws of the United
States, the Rules of Court, inclusive of the Michigan
State Constitution and the Constitution of the United
States for the United States of America to thereby rule
that Elizabeth Post, the lead Defendant in this instant
case standing in her Official and Individual Capacity,
breached the Constitution and Laws of Michigan, and
the United States, to then be declared unaccountable
by Federal Judicial Decree for Constitutional and
Lawful wrongs, that targeted this Petitioner.

4. Shall the lower Courts, the District Court
followed by the Appellate Court, judicially protect Offic
ers of the State 's Local Unit of Governance, alongside
co-respondents, who all are State Public Officers under
the realm of "Sovereign immunity " from accountability
in law and equity for Breaching Michigan 's Public Trust,
which is a common law wrong?

Shall the lower Courts shield State Public Actors from Constitutional conflicts?