1. WHY IS THERE NO EQUAL APPLICATION OF
RELEVANT FAIRNESS PRINCIPLES IN CIVIL
AND CRIMINAL MATTERS?

2. WHY IS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
ALLOWED TO SCHEME BETWEEN CRIMINAL
AND CIVIL MATTERS AS A LEGAL TACTIC
WITHOUT DISCLOSING THIS TO THE COURTS
OR TO EITHER PARTY, AND WHICH ALLOWS
THE USG TO SUBVERT THE PURSUIT OF THE
TRUTH, THE CONCEPTS OF FAIRNESS, AND
THE EQUAL APPLICATION OF JUSTICE UN
DER THE LAW?

3. WHY DOES THE UNITED STATES GOVERN
MENT NOT HAVE TO DISCLOSE TO THE
COURTS WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL WAS UN
DER CRIMINAL OR CIVIL INVESTIGATION AT
THE OUTSET USING FISA OR ANY OTHER
COURT ORDERED SURVEILLANCE WARRANT,
ESPECIALLY IN CASES INVOLVING CUR
RENT AND/OR FORMER USG FEDERAL EM
PLOYEES?

Why is there no equal application of relevant fairness principles in civil and criminal matters?