Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Kronos Incorporated
DueProcess Patent
1. Whether dismissing an appeal when a fee waiver Motion is pending is constitutional.
2. Whether dismissing the appeal after annihilating the record and falsely claiming the Appeal was not prosecuted against evidence to the contrary, is constitutional.
3. Whether not considering material intrinsic evidence of Patent Prosecution History makes it an improperly decided case.
4. Whether an improperly decided case falsely claimed as precedent and basis for collateral estoppel is constitutional.
5. Whether Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 17 U.S. 518 (1819) was properly decided against impairing the obligation of contract. If so, whether not upholding it as stare decisis precedent of this Court is constitutional.
6. Whether a Judge holding financial interests in a litigant constitutes an improperly decided case.
7. Whether denying a Case Management Conference to a citizen for 10 years, not permitting the citizen to be a litigant and gagging and sanctioning the citizen, with machinations faking as if the case went to trial, is constitutional
Whether dismissing an appeal when a fee waiver Motion is pending is constitutional