No. 22-1225
Jason Payne v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.
Relisted (8)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights civil-service-reform constitutional-challenge covid-19 covid-vaccination executive-order judicial-review mootness munsingwear-doctrine standing
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 8 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950).
2. Alternatively, whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Axon.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for dismissal as moot under United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
Docket Entries
2024-01-12
Judgment issued.
2023-12-11
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). Justice Jackson, concurring: Although I would require that the party seeking vacatur establish equitable entitlement to that remedy, I accede to vacatur here based on the Court’s established practice when the mootness occurs through the unilateral action of the party that prevailed in the lower court. See Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, 601 U. S. ___ (2023) (Jackson, J., concurring in the judgment).
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-09-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-05
Brief for respondents Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. filed.
2023-08-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 5, 2023.
2023-08-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 21, 2023 to September 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-07-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 21, 2023.
2023-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 21, 2023 to August 21, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Biden, Joseph R., et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Jason Payne
Christopher E. Mills — Spero Law LLC, Petitioner