No. 22-1218
Wendy Smith, et al. v. Keith Spizzirri, et al.
Tags: arbitration-agreement circuit-conflict circuit-split dismiss district-court-procedure federal-arbitration-act judicial-discretion section-3 statutory-interpretation stay
Key Terms:
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-01-12
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Section 3 of the FAA requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, or whether district courts have discretion to dismiss when all claims are subject to arbitration.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Section 3 of the FAA requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, or whether district courts have discretion to dismiss when all claims are subject to arbitration
Docket Entries
2024-06-17
Judgment Issued.
2024-05-16
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-1218_5357.pdf'>opinion</a> for a unanimous Court.
2024-04-22
Argued. For petitioners: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex. For respondents: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.
2024-04-12
Reply of petitioners Wendy Smith, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-04-10
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on March 6, 2024. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2024-04-01
Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-27
Brief of respondents Keith Spizzirri, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-03-27
CIRCULATED
2024-03-04
Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of neither party filed.
2024-03-04
Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice in support of neither party filed.
2024-02-26
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
2024-02-26
Brief of petitioners Wendy Smith, et al. filed.
2024-02-21
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
2024-02-16
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, April 22, 2024.
2024-01-12
Petition GRANTED.
2024-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-12-21
Reply of petitioners Wendy Smith, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
Brief of respondents Keith Spizzirri, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-10-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 4, 2023.
2023-10-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2023 to December 4, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 6, 2023.
2023-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 5, 2023 to November 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 5, 2023.
2023-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 5, 2023 to October 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-04
Response Requested. (Due September 5, 2023)
2023-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 17, 2023)
Attorneys
American Association for Justice
Keith Spizzirri, et al.
E. Joshua Rosenkranz — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Respondent
Laurent R. G. Badoux — Littler Mendelson, Respondent
New England Legal Foundation
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Andrew John Pincus — Mayer Brown LLP, Amicus
Wendy Smith, et al.
Daniel L. Geyser — Haynes and Boone, LLP, Petitioner