No. 22-1204

William Muhr v. Dawna Braswell

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: child-custody conflict-of-interest due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-assignment judicial-bias judicial-disqualification parental-rights
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question 1. Whether Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection were violated when Colorado allowed disqualified, prejudiced Chief Judges with a conflict of interest to pick whatever judge they want to decide Petitioner's case?

Question 2. Should a constitutionally minimum due process standard be established for the initial parenting hearing to protect fundamental liberty interests to raise children?

Question 3. Whether Colorado violated the parties' 14th Amendment rights by refusing to enforce their custody agreement?

Question 4. Whether remedies shall be afforded to vindicate harm suffered from the violation of unalienable and fundamental rights to parenting and to deter future violations?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment rights to due-process,equal-protection were violated when Colorado allowed disqualified,prejudiced Chief Judges with a conflict-of-interest to pick the judge to decide Petitioner's case

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-26
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-04-10

Attorneys

William Muhr
William Muhr — Petitioner