No. 22-1167
Baron Bond, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank Bond, et al. v. Roger D. Silk
Response Waived
Tags: accounting accounting-claim decedent-estate federal-jurisdiction judicial-jurisdiction marshall-precedent marshall-v-marshall probate-exception valuation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a complaint seeking, or requiring, an accounting or valuation of the assets of a decedent's estate continues, in the wake of Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), to come within the ambit of the probate exception to federal jurisdiction.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a complaint seeking, or requiring, an accounting or valuation of the assets of a decedent's estate continues, in the wake of Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), to come within the ambit of the probate exception to federal jurisdiction
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent Roger D. Silk to respond filed.
2023-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Baron Bond and Howard B. Miller, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Frank Bond
Jeffrey E. Nusinov — Nusinov Smith LLP, Petitioner
Roger D. Silk
Jason Cyrulnik — Cyrulnik Fattaruso, Respondent