No. 22-1166
D. K. Williams, Warden, et al. v. Rafiq Sabir, et al.
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-precedent due-process group-prayer inmate-rights prison-policy qualified-immunity religious-freedom-restoration-act
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Are RFRA claims exempt from the normally applicable qualified immunity requirement not to define clearly established law at a high level of generality; and
2. Was it clearly established that a policy limiting group prayer of three or more inmates to the prison chapel violated RFRA?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether RFRA claims are exempt from the requirement not to define clearly established law at a high level of generality
Docket Entries
2023-07-14
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2023-07-07
Joint stipulation to dismiss the case pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
2023-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2023)
2023-03-17
Application (22A825) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 28, 2023.
2023-03-15
Application (22A825) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 29, 2023 to May 28, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
D.K. Williams, et al.
Matthew Lee Bush — King & Spalding LLP, Petitioner
Rafiq Sabir and James J. Conyers
Christopher Godshall-Bennett — Muslim Advocates, Respondent