No. 22-1139

Victor Santana v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2023-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: bolstering-evidence criminal-appeal criminal-procedure hearsay hearsay-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions prior-bad-act-evidence prior-bad-acts trial-counsel
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Court of Criminal Appeals err in finding that trial counsel's errors did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Court of Criminal Appeals err in finding that trial counsel's errors did not amount to ineffective-assistance-of-counsel?

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-29
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-17
2023-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 17, 2023.
2023-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 13, 2023 to November 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2023.
2023-10-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2023 to November 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-13
Response Requested. (Due October 13, 2023)
2023-09-13
Record Requested.
2023-09-13
Record transmitted electronically from Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
2023-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 22, 2023)

Attorneys

State of Texas
Lori Denise BrodbeckTexas Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Texas
Rehana VohraHarris County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Victor Santana
Jonathan David LandersJonathan Landers, Attorney at Law, Petitioner