No. 22-1134

Siyu Yang, et al. v. University of Rochester, et al.

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2023-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. In Monroe County, N.Y. Supreme Court, JAMAL J. ROSSI, President of the Eastman School of Music, and Matthew Ardizzone, Associate President, submitted perjury under oath to the Judge. And these perjury just proved the essence of this case! Judge Ann Marie Taddeo of the Monroe County Supreme Court in New York deliberately avoided reviewing the issue. Deliberate malfeasance!

2. During the "perfect appeal" process of this case, the judicial officers involved at all levels in New York State violated the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution regarding civil rights, due process and equal protection. Repeatedly violated the basic rights of citizens.

3. Defendant's attorney LAURA H.HARSHBARGER deliberately tampered with the evidence number. And judges at all levels also deliberately avoided review.

4. In the process of "perfecting the appeal" in this case, the Monroe County Clerk's Office, NY, intentionally falsified the status of court records. Judges at all levels in the New York State Court have covered up and condoned this.

5. New York State judicial officers willfully violated the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. By means of violating th

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-06
Waiver of right of respondent University of Rochester, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-10

Attorneys

Siyu Yang, et al.
Siyu Yang — Petitioner
University of Rochester, et al.
Laura Hinsman HarshbargerBond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Respondent