No. 22-1110
Justin Paul Dreiling v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: constitution court-of-federal-claims equitable-jurisdiction equitable-relief executive-department executive-regulation judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction monetary-claims statutory-interpretation united-states
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw ERISA Patent
AdministrativeLaw ERISA Patent
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Shall the Court of Federal Claims have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States founded upon any regulation of an executive department?
2. Whether the Court should overrule United States v. Jones, 131 U.S. 1 (1889), or clarify the holding in Jones and recognize the plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) confers equitable jurisdiction upon the Court of Federal Claims.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Shall the Court of Federal Claims have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States founded upon any regulation of an executive department?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2023)
Attorneys
Justin P. Dreiling
Justin Paul Dreiling — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent