No. 22-1075
James E. Hinkle v. Ron Neal, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: 6th-amendment confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-precedent impeachment impeachment-evidence witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit's decision was contrary to federal precedent when it held that Hinkle's federal right to confrontation was not denied when Indiana courts prevented him from impeaching the alleged victim's testimony?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the right to confrontation was denied
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent Ron Neal, Warden to respond filed.
2023-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)
Attorneys
James Hinkle
Russell Wayne Brown Jr. — The Region Lawyers, Inc., Petitioner
Ron Neal, Warden
Thomas M. Fisher — Respondent