I
Whether United States v. Monsanto, 491 U.S. 600
(1989), and/or Kaley v. United States, 571 U.S. 320
(2014), should be overruled or at least modified.

II
If not inclined to reconsider Monsanto or Kaley,
whether the Court should nonetheless vacate outright
the ex parte restraint on the funds petitioner needs to
retain trial counsel of choice or, at a minimum, remand
for a hearing as to traceability, particularly when the
government concedes that the restrained funds were
neither listed in the indictment's forfeiture count nor
presented to the grand jury for a probable cause determination.

Whether United States v. Monsanto, 491 U.S. 600 (1989), and/or Kaley v. United States, 571 U.S. 320 (2014), should be overruled or at least modified