Does Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12 permit a defendant to file successive, pre-answer Rule 12(b)(6) motion(s) to dismiss —each towards a separate claim —six months apart?

Where as here, if a prisoner is subject to constant intra-facility transfers over a period of 24 months, does this constitute 'an expected parameter of the sentenced imposed by the trial court'?

Is it fundamentally unfair for the District Court to allow Petitioner's well documented claims of custodial abuse to remain in the pleadings stage, for 35 months before eventually dismissing the case?

Considering the nature and volume of the evidence lodged into the record, should the public-official defendants named below, be able to avoid liability for their overt acts/omissions?

After the United States Magistrate Judge declared that Petitioner stated a claim, did the 'burden shift' within the meaning of Mt. Healthy u. Doyle, for the purposes of § 1983 retaliation claims? Where is the constitutional line drawn between pleading standards and burden of proof?

Does Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12 permit a defendant to file successive, pre-answer Rule 12(b)(6) motion(s) to dismiss—each towards a separate claim—six months apart?