Is it fitting for three Democrat judges from a
district court and a panel of three Democrat judges
from an appellate court to decide a case that has
almost entirely Democrat defendants-appellees,
especially when one of them is the sitting New York
State Attorney General? Is such an unusual situation
grounds for transfer to another circuit?

Did the panel err in applying the in forma
pauperis (I.F.P.) statute, 28 U.S.C. §1915, to this case,
since I, the plaintiff-appellant, had paid the court fees,
had never been in prison and was not indigent? Was
this a due process violation, given that it resulted in
my not being heard at all?

Did the panel err in failing to address the
merits, or respond to any of the points raised in the
appellate brief? (Inter alia, the excessive speed and
brevity of the Decision revealed the District Court 's
predetermined view of the case, leave to replead was
not granted, the statement that the case is frivolous
was false, among other false statements, and Decision
was issued before exhibits were fully filed.)

Are the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention
Act of 1993 (18 U.S.C. §922) and the Intelligence
Identities Protection Act (50 U.S.C. §421)
unconstitutional?

Is it fitting for three Democrat judges from a district court and a panel of three Democrat judges from an appellate court to decide a case that has, almost entirely Democrat defendants?