No. 22-1020

H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. v. Unicolors, Inc.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-04-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: actual-knowledge civil-action copyright-act copyright-act-1976 copyright-infringement copyright-registration intent-to-defraud knowledge-standard scienter statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Copyright Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether § 411(b)(1)(A)'s "knowledge" element requires "actual knowledge," as this Court held, or "intent to defraud," as the Ninth Circuit held on remand.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether § 411(b)(1)(A)'s 'knowledge' element requires 'actual knowledge,' as this Court held, or 'intent to defraud,' as the Ninth Circuit held on remand

Docket Entries

2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent Unicolors, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-04-17

Attorneys

H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP
Peter K. StrisStris and Maher LLP, Petitioner
Unicolors, Inc.
Scott Alan BurroughsDoniger / Burroughs APC, Respondent