1. Whether facts brought by a witness before a jury
and tried by that jury can be reexamined by the
same witness before another body who was also a
witness before the jury.

2. Whether the facts that have been tried by the jury
in a criminal prosecution can be re-examined by
another body who was a witness in the same
criminal prosecution.

3. Whether the Federal Court has subject matter
jurisdiction over violation of Constitutionally
Protected Rights

4. Whether certain officers of the Respondent
proceeded without or in excess of jurisdiction

5. Whether certain officers of the Respondent
violated lawful procedure, acted arbitrary and
abuse discretion

6. Whether the actions of certain officers of the
Respondent implicated the Double Jeopardy
Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S
Constitution.

7. Whether any rule or regulations can override the
provisions of the US Constitution. The Appellant
believes that the Respondent officers actions and
the collaborators are guided by certain internal
rules unknown to the Appellant, whether such
rules allow the breach of the Constitutional
Guarantees or Constitutionally Protected Rights
of the Appellant.

8. Whether the actions of certain officers of the
Respondent and the collaborators violated the
Civil Rights of the Appellant.

9. Whether the actions of certain officers of the
Respondent violated Constitutionally Protected
Rights of the Appellant to wit the First
Amendment.

10. Whether the actions of certain officers of the
Respondent violated Constitutionally Protected
Rights of the Appellant to wit the Fourth
Amendment.

11. Whether the actions of certain officers of the
Respondent violated Constitutionally Protected
Rights of the Appellant to wit the Eighth
Amendment.

Whether facts brought by a witness before a jury and tried by that jury can be reexamined by the same witness before another body who was also a witness before the jury