No. 21-982
Timothy O. Markland v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure debt-collection default-judgment due-process extrinsic-evidence service-of-process statute-of-limitations time-bar
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether rigid invocation of the non-extrinsic evidence rule denies due process when a debt collection company obtains a default judgment and then waits to act on that judgment until the alleged debtor is time-barred from challenging the service of process.
2. Whether due process requires courts to use discretion in determining the need for extrinsic evidence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether rigid invocation of the non-extrinsic evidence rule denies due process
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-14
Waiver of right of respondent Asset Acceptance Corp. to respond filed.
2022-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 9, 2022)
Attorneys
Asset Acceptance Corp.
Scott F. Lehman — LSL Latham-Steele-Lehman, Respondent
Timothy Markland
Traci L. Soderstrom — Soderstrom & Associates, Petitioner