No. 21-981

Lan Tu Trinh v. David Fineman

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 12(b)(6) 12b6-motion appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-immunity pro-se-action quasi-judicial-immunity receiver-appointment section-1983 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the district court err by granting the receiver's motion to dismiss on immunity grounds under Rule 12(b)(6)?

2. Did the Third Circuit err by basing its affirmance on documents that were not attached to Petitioner's complaint?

3. Was the receiver entitled to the same absolute immunity afforded to judges?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the district court err by granting the receiver's motion to dismiss on immunity grounds under Rule 12(b)(6)?

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-08
Brief of respondent David Fineman in opposition filed.
2021-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 9, 2022)

Attorneys

David Fineman
Andrew Alan ChirlsFineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C., Respondent
Lan Tu Trinh
Michael March BrownleeThe Brownlee Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner