No. 21-960

Oklahoma v. Jessy Shay Bailey

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2021-12-30
Status: GVR
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedRelisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-jurisdiction due-process equal-protection indian-country mcgirt-v-oklahoma tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference: 2022-06-29 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.

2. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country

Docket Entries

2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-08-01
MANDATE ISSUED
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-03-25
Brief of respondent Jessy Shay Bailey in opposition filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-02-23
Response Requested. (Due March 25, 2022)
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-01-05
Brief amicus curiae of Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2021-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 31, 2022)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
Frank Sharp Holleman IV — Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry, LLP, Amicus
Jessy Shay Bailey
James L. Hankins — Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner