1. Whether this Court's First Amendment speech and petitioning precedents on the fundamental constitutional right to access the court as expressed in Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977) and progeny guarantee Petitioner a remedy and rejection of the Fifth District Court of Appeal Per Curiam Affirmed ("PCA") Order, adopting the trial court's Opinion that a plaintiff lack standing to sue the Florida Bar.

2. Whether a trial or appellate judge, with economic interest, in a membership in good standing in the Respondent bar association, and over whom the Respondent exercise continuing discipline for acts on the bench, after leaving the bench, violate a plaintiff's Due Process right, guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, when presiding in an adversarial lawsuit against the Bar.

3. Whether the Fifth District Court of Appeal is correct that the Bar is absolutely immune from suit.

Whether the Florida Bar's compulsory membership and dues violate the First Amendment right to refrain from subsidizing the organization's political or ideological activities