Whether the opinion of the Eleventh Circuit affirming the lower Court's decision in dismissing the Pro se, federal question in forma pauperis complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C 2520 as "frivolous" without a hearing, is in direct conflict with the opinion of the Eighth Circuit rendered in Abramson v Mitchell, 459 F 2d 955 (Circuit 8, 1972).

Whether the opinion of the Eleventh Circuit affirming the lower Court's decision in dismissing the Pro se in forma pauperis complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 USC 1915 without a hearing, is in direct conflict with the opinion of the Ninth Circuit rendered in Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25 (1992) when remanded for a hearing.

Whether the opinion of the Eleventh Circuit affirming the lower Court's decision in dismissing the Pro se, federal question in forma pauperis complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C 2520 as 'frivolous' without a hearing, is in direct conflict with the opinion of the Eighth Circuit