No. 21-899
Lauren Rosecan v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: collateral-order-doctrine criminal-information criminal-procedure due-process felony grand-jury grand-jury-clause interlocutory-appeal jurisdictional-defect pretrial-motion
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss
a criminal information that charges, in violation of theGrand Jury Clause, felony offenses without petitioner'sconsent is interlocutorily appealable under thecollateral order doctrine?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss a criminal information that charges, in violation of the Grand Jury Clause, felony offenses without petitioner's consent is interlocutorily appealable under the collateral order doctrine?
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Lauren Rosecan
Richard C. Klugh Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent