No. 21-898
Blake Conyers, et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: circuit-split due-process fifth-amendment fourth-amendment inventory-search municipal-policy property-rights property-seizure
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
May a municipality, consistent with the Fourth and Fifth Amendments and pursuant to an explicit policy, destroy or sell property seized during the inventory search of an arrestee because the arrestee remains in custody awaiting trial for more than 30 days and is unable to retrieve the property?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a municipality, consistent with the Fourth and Fifth Amendments and pursuant to an explicit policy, destroy or sell property seized during the inventory search of an arrestee because the arrestee remains in custody awaiting trial for more than 30 days and is unable to retrieve the property?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-25
Reply of petitioners Blake Conyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-03-11
Brief of respondent City of Chicago, Illinois in opposition filed.
2022-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2022
2022-01-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 9, 2022 to March 11, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-10
Response Requested. (Due February 9, 2022)
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent City of Chicago, Illinois to respond filed.
2021-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Blake Conyers, et al.
Kenneth N. Flaxman — Kenneth N Flaxman P.C., Petitioner
City of Chicago, Illinois
Myriam Zreczny Kasper — City of Chicago Department of Law, Respondent
Ellen W. McLaughlin — Department of Law Chicago, Respondent