No. 21-88
Christina Paylan v. Darrell Dirks, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: accountability civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-accountability judicial-bias judicial-recusal standing
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the standard for judicial recusal requires a second look with establishment of a strict uniform criteria whereby the largely relied upon discretionary case-by-case analysis standard is abandoned, given that the average American is increasingly concerned with lack of judicial accountability engrained into the American legal system?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the standard for judicial recusal requires a strict uniform criteria
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent City of Tampa to respond filed.
2021-08-09
Waiver of right of respondents Chad Chronister as Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Comanechi Devage, Timothy Allen, Kyle Robinson to respond filed.
2021-08-09
Waiver of right of respondents Brian Bishop, Mark Detrio, Russell Marcotrigiano, Kenneth Morman to respond filed.
2021-08-09
Waiver of right of respondents Assistant State Attorney Chrisine Brown, et al. to respond filed.
2021-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 23, 2021)
Attorneys
Assistant State Attorney Chrisine Brown, et al.
Eugenia Izmaylova — Office of the Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Brian Bishop, Mark Detrio, Russell Marcotrigiano, Kenneth Morman
Andrew Ian Dayes — Dayes Law Firm, PLLC, Respondent
Chad Chronister as Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Comanechi Devage, Timothy Allen, Kyle Robinson
Christopher E. Brown — Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Respondent
Christina Paylan
Christina Paylan — Petitioner
City of Tampa