Classic Cab Company v. District of Columbia Department of For-Hire Vehicles
I. Is the use of a sham hearing process where the
agency subject to an appeals process has the authority
to overturn the determination of an independent
adjudicating officer a violation of due process?
II. Is a hearing where a judicial officer advocates for
a government agency by admitted otherwise
inadmissible evidence and by looking up or obtaining
evidence otherwise not introduced a violation of due
process?
III. Is it a denial of due process where a petitioner
has a right to judicial review under state law but the
highest court of that state refuses to review the matter
on the merit of the issue based on a mootness
determination admittedly caused by the action of the
government agency' action and in __ direct
contradiction of its own state precedent?
Is the use of a sham hearing process where the agency subject to an appeals process has the authority to overturn the determination of an independent adjudicating officer a violation of due process?