No. 21-856
Barry D. Bilder v. Janice Dykstra
Response Waived
Tags: agreement-construction civil-procedure clean-hands contract-ambiguity contract-interpretation contract-law contract-terms due-process fact-determination fraud good-faith legal-definition
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
In contracts, after signing an agreement, is the term, "new fact," applicable to a fact that is new and previously unknown to one party, or new and previously unknown to both (all) parties?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
In contracts, after signing an agreement, is the term, 'new fact,' applicable to a fact that is new and previously unknown to one party, or new and previously unknown to both (all) parties?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-21
Waiver of right of respondent Janice Dsystra to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2022)
2021-11-05
Application (21A128) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until December 10, 2021.
2021-11-01
Application (21A128) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2021 to January 6, 2022, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Barry D. Bilder
Barry D. Bilder — Petitioner
Janice Dsystra
Riccardo A. DiMonte — DiMonte and Lizak, LLC, Respondent