1. Whether a writ of certiorari is appropriate because, contrary to the denial of mandamus and prohibition by the court of appeals and its holding, the district court's order resulted from failure to carry out its federal judicial duty to establish, and stay within, its limited jurisdictional authority, and is clear and indisputable legal error, requiring issuance of the requested writs, or determination that the order was void, and that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over the Petitioner's state law action.

2. Whether writ of certiorari is required because the court of appeals erred in failing to issue writ of mandamus or prohibition to correct, and restrain, the district court's abuse of its powers, and abuse of its discretion, in violation of procedural due process and the Petitioner's Constitutional rights at law.

3. Whether certiorari is appropriate to correct the failure to consider mandamus requested for the district court's clear abuse of discretion in refusing to certify its order for interlocutory appeal.

Whether a writ of certiorari is appropriate due to the district court's failure to establish and stay within its limited jurisdictional authority