No. 21-831
Matt P. Jacobsen v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: claim-preclusion factfinding federal-jurisdiction judicial-notice logically-consistent mortgage-dispute prior-action res-judicata statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does Res Judicata apply when the earlier action(s) did not cover all the claims and allegations of the later case?
2. Must a District Court find facts?
3. Must a District Court correct orders in such a way as to be consistent?
4. May a court take judicial notice of the truth of public records?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Res Judicata apply when the earlier action(s) did not cover all the claims and allegations of the later case?
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-05
Waiver of right of respondent Rushmore Loan Management, LLC to respond filed.
2021-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 5, 2022)
Attorneys
Matt Jacobsen
Matt P. Jacobsen — Petitioner
Rushmore Loan Management, LLC
Robert L. Negrin — Aldridge Pite, LLP, Respondent