No. 21-829
Timothy Scott Hardin v. United States
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: 18-usc-2252 18-usc-2252a age-of-consent categorical-approach criminal-law federal-sentencing minor sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements state-statutes statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under federal law, the Model Penal Code, and the laws of 39 states and the District of Columbia, consensual sex between a 21-year-old and a 17-year-old is legal. In 11 states, such conduct is criminalized. The question presented is whether, under the categorical approach, a conviction under one of those 11 states' statutes "relat[es] to . . . abusive sexual conduct involving a minor" and thus serves as a predicate for the sentencing enhancements in Sections 2252 and 2252A of title 18 of the U.S. Code.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a conviction under state statutes criminalizing consensual sex between a 21-year-old and a 17-year-old constitutes a predicate offense for federal sentencing enhancements
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-03
Brief amici curiae of Due Process Institute and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
2021-10-12
Application (21A66) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 2, 2021.
2021-10-07
Application (21A66) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 18, 2021 to December 2, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Due Process Institute and National Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers
James Wesley Crooks — Fairmark Partners, LLP, Amicus
Timothy Hardin
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent