I. Whether the United States Supreme Court decision recognizing ineffective assistance of counsel claims for criminal defense counsels failure to advise or to misadvise a defendant of immigration consequences of a plea announced a constitutional right that changed Pennsylvania law after Defendant's conviction was final and has retroactive effect

II. Whether Defendant should be entitled to establish equitable tolling of the 60 day requirement of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(2) or the sixty-days should run from the affirmation of retroactivity.

III. Whether Defendant's claims fall under habeas corpus relief that is outside of the PCRA statute and its time limits.

Whether the Padilla decision has retroactive effect