No. 21-8265
Michael S. Gorbey v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review appointment-of-counsel compassionate-release constitutional-rights covid-19 criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). The Chief Justice and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2022-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2022)
Attorneys
Michael Gorbey
Michael Gorbey — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent