No. 21-823
Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: citizenship-revocation civil-procedure congressional-power denaturalization due-process good-cause-affidavit jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirement naturalization naturalization-proceedings statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a)'s requirement that the United States Attorney for the respective district institute proceedings is a jurisdictional requirement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a)'s requirement that the United States Attorney for the respective district institute proceedings is a jurisdictional requirement?
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah
Julie A. Goldberg — Goldberg & Associates, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent