No. 21-8219
Dante Danil Carter v. California
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment criminal-procedure doyle-v-ohio due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment miranda miranda-rights post-miranda-silence self-incrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE CALIFORNIA TRIAL COURT DEPRIVED CARTER OF HIS 5TH, 6TH OR 14TH AMENDMENTS PERMITTING THE PROSECUTION TO IMPERMISSIBLY USE HIS POST-MIRANDA SILENCE AGAINST HIM, THUS VIOLATING DOYLE V. OHIO (1976) 426 U.S.610, AND MIRANDA V. ARIZONA (1966) 384 U.S.436,468 FN.37?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the California trial court deprived Carter of his 5th and 14th Amendment rights by permitting the prosecution to impermissibly use his post-Miranda silence against him, violating Doyle v. Ohio and Miranda v. Arizona
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Dante Carter
Dante Danil Carter — Petitioner