No. 21-8215
Nathaniel Ausbie v. United States
Tags: appellate-review court-of-appeals criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process government-theory jury-instructions legal-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for his conviction, may a court of appeals affirm based on a theory different from the one the Government presented to the jury?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for his conviction, may a court of appeals affirm based on a theory different from the one the Government presented to the jury?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Nathaniel Ausbie
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent