\o^€r Cc^r-V violate f^ixU clM Ap$d\c^A4 o^iisVh^ion^\
rUjh% U| ^ccA'incj +<7 tAiwrc 4KaA He ftnou/.A^Wj cuuk voWA^'A^ uxuued. hi-b C .5K4 4t?
C-oan^\^

2.,D\dl $0 lower C0tcr4 vriaAc KW A^e^i l*\& iUV .oavi
C'.^S V-^S^e 4k*A W,\Wo,^ <maA v/oIuaW',^ wfc.w«A V**. V,s ri3
0- '^Jks^ 4rc .f0v ^

3;D;d ^c*H S *
r^Vte cmA ^-4^ ^ ^ ^h4- 4o
o£ oHi t>f ^r *, 7
o-f h&iL[&^c aA(0^ <?-f ^

Did the lower court violate Maryland Rule 4-215 and Appellant's constitutional rights by failing to ensure that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel?